
lastlabyrinth replied to your post: controversial opinion time?
I agree :( I have been called insane for painting my nebulae from scratch, but come on! What make NASA so different that you don’t have to credit them? If you’re going to present it as your art it needs to be your art, IMO.
your nebulae are AWESOME… i’ve tried to do it and it’s really hard

hanel replied to your post: controversial opinion time?
This should be a no-brainer to people, really, but I guess a lot of them just ‘forget’. People make such a huge fuss about crediting reference images, yet not for these? Come on… Btw, you’re going to be an astronomer? :o So coool!
Well, I don’t think people are doing it maliciously, like trying to scam nasa by pretending it’s their own work or whatever. As a response to both people’s comments here, I think it’s more a subconscious sense that these images kind of exist in a void since they’re captured by machines (nevermind processing pipelines and other software coded by humans, not to mention the telescope itself) that are managed by large, somewhat faceless organizations like NASA or ESA, at least on the funding scale (although the point of publishing them is to bring astronomy closer to the public). Another famous image brought to mind that I saw used in someone’s art recently is this (imo) extremely beautiful image of particle tracks in a bubble chamber. It’s pretty, somewhat inaccessible to non-specialists, and published by CERN, who manage a huge particle accelerator in Europe. I’ve seen this photo since I was little, but didn’t know what it was until I started studying physics. It’s been in my unconscious somewhere for years, but I didn’t even know it was published by CERN until I looked it up just now. Like a lot of famous astronomy pictures, I think it’s just been ‘there’ in the public unconscious so long that they kind of just exist on their own now, which is kind of :\ to me because it was a lot of people’s hard work and science to get those images in the first place.
As for the last comment, heh well I’m not sure if I want to BE an astronomer as a career, but I am enrolled in an astrophysics phd program (currently on a leave, though) so I’m getting the training at least.
also my plan is, if i get rich, i’m totally commissioning a stained glass window of that bubble chamber pic, just sayin…